首页> 外文OA文献 >The Experiential Blink: mapping the cost of working memory encoding onto conscious perception in the attentional blink
【2h】

The Experiential Blink: mapping the cost of working memory encoding onto conscious perception in the attentional blink

机译:体验眨眼:将工作记忆编码的成本映射到注意眨眼中的意识感知上

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The attentional blink (AB) represents a cognitive deficit in reporting the second of two targets (T2), when that second target appears 200-600 msec after the first (T1). However, it is unclear how this paradigm impacts the subjective visibility (that is, the conscious perception) of T2, and whether the temporal profile of T2 report accuracy matches the temporal profile of subjective visibility. In order to compare report accuracy and subjective visibility, we asked participants to identify T1 and T2, and to rate the subjective visibility of T2 across two experiments. Event-related potentials were also measured. The results revealed different profiles for the report of T2 versus the subjective visibility of T2, particularly when T1 and T2 appeared within 200 msec of one another. Specifically, T2 report accuracy was high but T2 visibility was low when the two targets appeared in close temporal succession, suggesting what we call the Experiential Blink is different from the classic AB. Electrophysiologically, at lag-1, the P3 component was modulated more by subjective visibility than by report accuracy. Collectively, the data indicate that the deficit in accurately reporting T2 is not the same as the deficit in subjectively experiencing T2. This suggests that traditional understandings of the AB may require adjustment and that, consistent with other findings, working memory (WM) encoding and conscious perception may not be synonymous.
机译:当第二个目标出现在第一个目标之后的200-600毫秒时,注意眨眼(AB)表示在报告两个目标中的第二个目标(T2)时出现认知缺陷。但是,尚不清楚此范式如何影响T2的主观可见性(即,有意识的感知),以及T2报告的时间概况是否与主观可见性的时间概况相匹配。为了比较报告的准确性和主观能见度,我们要求参与者确定T1和T2,并对两个实验中T2的主观能见度进行评分。还测量了与事件相关的电位。结果揭示了T2的报告与T2的主观能见度之间的差异,特别是当T1和T2出现在彼此200毫秒之内时。具体来说,当两个目标在时间上相继出现时,T2报告的准确性很高,但T2可见性却很低,这表明我们所说的“体验眨眼”与经典AB不同。在电生理学上,在lag-1时,P3组分受主观可见度的调节比受报告准确性的调节更多。总体而言,数据表明准确报告T2的缺陷与主观经历T2的缺陷不同。这表明对AB的传统理解可能需要调整,并且与其他发现一致,工作记忆(WM)编码和意识感知可能不是同义词。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号